FranceBelgiqueUSAUK
Product survey of 23 to 28 inch Full HD LCD monitors >
Samsung SyncMaster 245T
Diagonal screen size 24 pouces
Type S-PVA
Resolution 1920 x 1200 pixels
Response time 6 ms
Interfaces (HDMI / DVI / VGA / YUV) 1 / 1 / 1 / 1
Options Pied ajustable en hauteur, pivot,
socle rotatif, MPA
Viewing angles (H/V) 178°/178°
After these deceptions, what should we expect from future LCDs?
The future of artificial sweeping (backlight scanning) in monitors seems to be compromised as there have been two attempts and two failures. Some like Samsung prefer to stress the wide gamut. This is also interesting but only for a certain group of users: those equipped with a pro reflex and which take the time to manually go outside of the NTSC color space. On a standard camera, display in NTSC can often negatively affect rendering making pure shades close to fluorescent.

Another item is the integration of rescaling circuitry. We are firm believers in this but its take off has been slow. Belinea flirted with it but without success on its o.display 6.1 22w, while LG offers a solution of this type on its 22LS4D. We would have liked to have tested it but this manufacturer has told us for months that they couldn’t get us a model. Rarely a good sign...

There is one last area. A year ago, two manufacturers announced (amongst a lot of glitz and glamour) the imminent release of the first panels with a 1 ms response time. We are now in 2008 and nothing is here. Can we hope for this to change?

Vincent Alzieu
Test date: 2008-02-20
Exactly one year ago, Samsung proudly unveiled the SyncMaster 245T in its stand at the CeBIT (the big technological expo which takes place every year in Hannover, Germany).  This monitor was said to be the forerunner of a new generation, half-way between televisions and monitors, half-way between LCDs and tube screens.  From TVs it has inherited the HDMI and YUV inputs which are useful for connecting the latest generation consoles and players.  From CRTs, it had an artificial sweeping system where a black band is displayed on the screen at high speed in order to reduce afterglow.  The idea is only logical but it isn’t completely new as BenQ introduced it a few months earlier on its 241W Z.  (It’s interesting to point out that BenQ confirms having used entire images instead of black strips while our lab found the opposite to be true).  However, this innovation unfortunately did not reap the expected praise.  In our opinion, we find that their solution which is based on vertically sweeping an 1/8th of the screen noticeably improves afterglow although it is to the detriment of color homogeneity and causes noticeable shimmering.

On its 245T, Samsung doesn’t use 1/8 of the screen but rather a band that almost covers a ¼ of the monitor.   Our verdict this time is that once the function is activated it’s worse than BenQ’s result.  There is no visual progress in eliminating afterglow while the sensation of shimmering and lack of homogeneity is amplified.


Forget MPA, remember its ergonomics and price


Moreover, Samsung is on the same track.  Their labs probably found the same thing and for this reason a year after having been unveiled the function is still deactivated by default and simply omitted from basic monitor characteristics.  You have to delve into the American product sheet (the 245T is absent from the French site!) to read a brief ''MPA HAS'' without any other explanation.  Samsung France even confirmed having made the choice of finally not listing this technological ''improvement''.

For more details on MPA and images on this screen, see our article on Behardware.com

Verdict:  in the end, the 245T can be summed up as a high end 24 inch with fine ergonomics (it still lacks a card reader and USB hub present with Dell), and equipped with a PVA panel.  Once MPA is deactivated, the 245T has performances in the upper average.  Reactivity is particularly good, barely inferior to that of 2 ms TNs, its blacks are deep and color fidelity is good especially in grays while being more problematic in pure colors.  Graphic artists won’t want to skip calibration.


- Ergonomics, finishing touches

- Large viewing angles from all directions

- Very good reactivity

- Multiple video inputs

- Price

- Imperfect colors. But for the price?

- No zero dead pixel policy

It should be a flagship screen, a demonstration of this manufacturer’s technical know-how. A year later it’s disappointing that artificial sweeping technology hasn’t been perfected. This makes an almost normal screen expensive.

Our RSS News Feeds :